Cody by Sourcegraph vs Sourcery
Neutral, data‑driven comparison to evaluate code assistance.
Comparing 2 AI tools.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Upvotes | 9 | 2 |
Avg. Rating | 4.0 | N/A |
Slogan | Accelerate code review with AI assistance | From Sentry alert to fixed code—AI-powered detection, diagnosis, and automated fixes for production issues. |
Category | ||
Pricing Model | Enterprise Contact for Pricing | Freemium Enterprise Contact for Pricing |
Pricing Details | As of July 23, 2025, Cody Free and Cody Pro plans have been discontinued, and Cody is no longer included in the Enterprise Starter plan. Only Cody Enterprise is available, targeting large organizations; pricing is seat-based or token-based, typically requires contacting sales. | Free tier (up to 20 issues/month), Resolution Plus at $200/month (200+ issues), Enterprise plan—contact for pricing. Code review: Free (open source), Pro $12-15/seat/month, Team $24/seat/month, Enterprise—contact for pricing. |
Platforms | ||
Target Audience | Software Developers, Product Managers, Business Executives, Entrepreneurs, Educators | Software Developers, Product Managers, Entrepreneurs |
Website |
Why this comparison matters
This comprehensive comparison of Cody by Sourcegraph and Sourcery provides objective, data-driven insights to help you choose the best code assistance solution for your needs. We evaluate both tools across multiple dimensions including feature depth, pricing transparency, integration capabilities, security posture, and real-world usability.
Whether you're evaluating tools for personal use, team collaboration, or enterprise deployment, this comparison highlights key differentiators, use case recommendations, and cost-benefit considerations to inform your decision. Both tools are evaluated based on verified data, community feedback, and technical capabilities.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Cody by Sourcegraph if:
- Enterprise-ready—Cody by Sourcegraph offers enterprise-grade features, SSO, and dedicated support
- Specialized in productivity & collaboration—Cody by Sourcegraph offers category-specific features and optimizations for productivity & collaboration workflows
- Unique features—Cody by Sourcegraph offers code search and code intelligence capabilities not found in Sourcery
Choose Sourcery if:
- Budget-conscious teams—Sourcery offers a free tier for testing, while Cody by Sourcegraph requires a paid subscription
- Developer-friendly—Sourcery provides comprehensive API and 2 SDKs for custom integrations, while Cody by Sourcegraph has limited developer tools
- Cross-platform access—Sourcery works across 3 platforms, while Cody by Sourcegraph is more limited
- Security-first design—Sourcery prioritizes data security and compliance features
- Multilingual support—Sourcery supports 6 languages vs Cody by Sourcegraph's 4
Pro tip: Start with a free trial or free tier if available. Test both tools with real workflows to evaluate performance, ease of use, and integration depth. Consider your team size, technical expertise, and long-term scalability needs when making your final decision.
When to Choose Each Tool
When to Choose Cody by Sourcegraph
Cody by Sourcegraph is the better choice when you prioritize specific features and capabilities. Cody by Sourcegraph making it ideal for enterprise users requiring robust features.
Ideal for:
- Enterprise-ready—Cody by Sourcegraph offers enterprise-grade features, SSO, and dedicated support
- Specialized in productivity & collaboration—Cody by Sourcegraph offers category-specific features and optimizations for productivity & collaboration workflows
- Unique features—Cody by Sourcegraph offers code search and code intelligence capabilities not found in Sourcery
Target Audiences:
When to Choose Sourcery
Sourcery excels when you need broader platform support (3 vs 2 platforms). Sourcery supports 3 platforms compared to Cody by Sourcegraph's 2, making it ideal for teams with specific requirements.
Ideal for:
- Budget-conscious teams—Sourcery offers a free tier for testing, while Cody by Sourcegraph requires a paid subscription
- Developer-friendly—Sourcery provides comprehensive API and 2 SDKs for custom integrations, while Cody by Sourcegraph has limited developer tools
- Cross-platform access—Sourcery works across 3 platforms, while Cody by Sourcegraph is more limited
- Security-first design—Sourcery prioritizes data security and compliance features
- Multilingual support—Sourcery supports 6 languages vs Cody by Sourcegraph's 4
Target Audiences:
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cody by Sourcegraph
Value Proposition
Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage.
ROI Considerations
Sourcery
Value Proposition
Freemium model allows gradual scaling without upfront commitment. Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage. Multi-platform support reduces need for multiple tool subscriptions. API and SDK access enable custom automation, reducing manual work.
ROI Considerations
- Single tool replaces multiple platform-specific solutions
- API access enables automation, reducing manual work
Cost Analysis Tip: Beyond sticker price, consider total cost of ownership including setup time, training, integration complexity, and potential vendor lock-in. Tools with free tiers allow risk-free evaluation, while usage-based pricing aligns costs with value. Factor in productivity gains, reduced manual work, and improved outcomes when calculating ROI.
Who Should Use Each Tool?
Cody by Sourcegraph is Best For
- Software Developers
- Product Managers
- Business Executives
- Entrepreneurs
- Educators
Sourcery is Best For
- Software Developers
- Product Managers
- Entrepreneurs
Pricing Comparison
Cody by Sourcegraph
Pricing Model
Enterprise, Contact for Pricing
Details
As of July 23, 2025, Cody Free and Cody Pro plans have been discontinued, and Cody is no longer included in the Enterprise Starter plan. Only Cody Enterprise is available, targeting large organizations; pricing is seat-based or token-based, typically requires contacting sales.
Estimated Monthly Cost
$+/month
SourceryBest Value
Pricing Model
Freemium, Enterprise, Contact for Pricing
Details
Free tier (up to 20 issues/month), Resolution Plus at $200/month (200+ issues), Enterprise plan—contact for pricing. Code review: Free (open source), Pro $12-15/seat/month, Team $24/seat/month, Enterprise—contact for pricing.
Estimated Monthly Cost
$+/month
Strengths & Weaknesses
Cody by Sourcegraph
Strengths
- Developer-friendly (2+ SDKs)
Limitations
- No free tier
- Few integrations
- Not GDPR compliant
- No public API
Sourcery
Strengths
- Free tier available
- Multi-platform support (3 platforms)
- Developer-friendly (2+ SDKs)
- API available
Limitations
- Not GDPR compliant
Community Verdict
Cody by Sourcegraph
Sourcery
Integration & Compatibility Comparison
Cody by Sourcegraph
Platform Support
Integrations
Limited integration options
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
Sourcery
Platform Support
✓ Multi-platform support enables flexible deployment
Integrations
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
✓ REST API available for custom integrations
Integration Evaluation: Assess how each tool fits into your existing stack. Consider API availability for custom integrations if native options are limited. Evaluate integration depth, authentication methods (OAuth, API keys), webhook support, and data synchronization capabilities. Test integrations in your environment before committing.
Developer Experience
Cody by Sourcegraph
SDK Support
Sourcery
SDK Support
API
✅ REST API available
Deployment & Security
Cody by Sourcegraph
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
Sourcery
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
Common Use Cases
Cody by Sourcegraph
+2 more use cases available
Sourcery
+9 more use cases available
Making Your Final Decision
Choosing between Cody by Sourcegraph and Sourcery ultimately depends on your specific requirements, team size, budget constraints, and long-term goals. Both tools offer unique strengths that may align differently with your workflow.
Consider Cody by Sourcegraph if:
- •Enterprise-ready—Cody by Sourcegraph offers enterprise-grade features, SSO, and dedicated support
- •Specialized in productivity & collaboration—Cody by Sourcegraph offers category-specific features and optimizations for productivity & collaboration workflows
- •Unique features—Cody by Sourcegraph offers code search and code intelligence capabilities not found in Sourcery
Consider Sourcery if:
- •Budget-conscious teams—Sourcery offers a free tier for testing, while Cody by Sourcegraph requires a paid subscription
- •Developer-friendly—Sourcery provides comprehensive API and 2 SDKs for custom integrations, while Cody by Sourcegraph has limited developer tools
- •Cross-platform access—Sourcery works across 3 platforms, while Cody by Sourcegraph is more limited
Next Steps
- Start with free trials: Both tools likely offer free tiers or trial periods. Use these to test real workflows and evaluate performance firsthand.
- Involve your team: Get feedback from actual users who will interact with the tool daily. Their input on usability and workflow integration is invaluable.
- Test integrations: Verify that each tool integrates smoothly with your existing stack. Check API documentation, webhook support, and authentication methods.
- Calculate total cost: Look beyond monthly pricing. Factor in setup time, training, potential overages, and long-term scalability costs.
- Review support and roadmap: Evaluate vendor responsiveness, documentation quality, and product roadmap alignment with your needs.
Remember: The "best" tool is the one that fits your specific context. What works for one organization may not work for another. Take your time, test thoroughly, and choose based on verified data rather than marketing claims. Both Cody by Sourcegraph and Sourcery are capable solutions—your job is to determine which aligns better with your unique requirements.
Top Code Assistance tools
- 4GitHub CopilotFree tier
Your AI pair programmer
Web AppDesktop AppMobile App#ai code assistant#code completion#automated code generation4.0(2)391Integrations: 1
Explore by audience
FAQ
Is Cody by Sourcegraph better than Sourcery for Code Assistance?
There isn’t a universal winner—decide by fit. Check: (1) Workflow/UI alignment; (2) Total cost at your usage (seats, limits, add‑ons); (3) Integration coverage and API quality; (4) Data handling and compliance. Use the table above to align these with your priorities.
What are alternatives to Cody by Sourcegraph and Sourcery?
Explore adjacent options in the Code Assistance category. Shortlist by feature depth, integration maturity, transparent pricing, migration ease (export/API), security posture (e.g., SOC 2/ISO 27001), and roadmap velocity. Prefer tools proven in production in stacks similar to yours and with clear SLAs/support.
What should I look for in Code Assistance tools?
Checklist: (1) Must‑have vs nice‑to‑have features; (2) Cost at your scale (limits, overages, seats); (3) Integrations and API quality; (4) Privacy & compliance (GDPR/DSA, retention, residency); (5) Reliability/performance (SLA, throughput, rate limits); (6) Admin, audit, SSO; (7) Support and roadmap. Validate with a fast pilot on your real workloads.
How should I compare pricing for Cody by Sourcegraph vs Sourcery?
Normalize to your usage. Model seats, limits, overages, add‑ons, and support. Include hidden costs: implementation, training, migration, and potential lock‑in. Prefer transparent metering if predictability matters.
What due diligence is essential before choosing a Code Assistance tool?
Run a structured pilot: (1) Replicate a real workflow; (2) Measure quality and latency; (3) Verify integrations, API limits, error handling; (4) Review security, PII handling, compliance, and data residency; (5) Confirm SLA, support response, and roadmap.