Augment vs Cody by Sourcegraph

Neutral, data‑driven comparison to evaluate code assistance.

Comparing 2 AI tools.

Upvotes:
16
Avg. Rating:
5.0
Slogan:
Enhance Your Code Efficiency
Pricing Model:
Freemium
Enterprise
Pricing Details:
Four public tiers: Community (Free, up to 50 user messages with $10 per 100 extra messages), Developer ($50/month, up to 600 messages), Pro ($100/month, up to 1,500 messages), Max ($250/month, up to 4,500 messages), plus Enterprise (custom). All paid plans allow extra user messages at $10 per 100. Pricing now charges by successful user messages. 14-day free trial available for Developer plan.
Platforms:
Web App
CLI Tool
API
Target Audience:
Software Developers, Product Managers, Business Executives, Entrepreneurs, Educators
Website:
Visit Site
Upvotes:
9
Avg. Rating:
4.0
Slogan:
Accelerate code review with AI assistance
Pricing Model:
Enterprise
Contact for Pricing
Pricing Details:
As of July 23, 2025, Cody Free and Cody Pro plans have been discontinued, and Cody is no longer included in the Enterprise Starter plan. Only Cody Enterprise is available, targeting large organizations; pricing is seat-based or token-based, typically requires contacting sales.
Platforms:
Web App
Plugin/Integration
Target Audience:
Software Developers, Product Managers, Business Executives, Entrepreneurs, Educators
Website:
Visit Site

Why this comparison matters

This comprehensive comparison of Augment and Cody by Sourcegraph provides objective, data-driven insights to help you choose the best code assistance solution for your needs. We evaluate both tools across multiple dimensions including feature depth, pricing transparency, integration capabilities, security posture, and real-world usability.

Whether you're evaluating tools for personal use, team collaboration, or enterprise deployment, this comparison highlights key differentiators, use case recommendations, and cost-benefit considerations to inform your decision. Both tools are evaluated based on verified data, community feedback, and technical capabilities.

Core features and quality
Pricing and total cost
Integrations and platform support
Privacy, security, compliance

Quick Decision Guide

Choose Augment if:

  • Budget-conscious teams—Augment offers a free tier for testing, while Cody by Sourcegraph requires a paid subscription
  • Cross-platform access—Augment works across 3 platforms, while Cody by Sourcegraph is more limited
  • Multilingual support—Augment supports 6 languages vs Cody by Sourcegraph's 4
  • Unique features—Augment offers code augmentation and code generation capabilities not found in Cody by Sourcegraph

Choose Cody by Sourcegraph if:

  • Advanced analytics—Cody by Sourcegraph provides deeper insights and data visualization capabilities
  • Specialized in productivity & collaboration—Cody by Sourcegraph offers category-specific features and optimizations for productivity & collaboration workflows
  • AI-powered capabilities—Cody by Sourcegraph highlights advanced AI features: "Accelerate code review with AI assistance"
  • Unique features—Cody by Sourcegraph offers code search and code intelligence capabilities not found in Augment

Pro tip: Start with a free trial or free tier if available. Test both tools with real workflows to evaluate performance, ease of use, and integration depth. Consider your team size, technical expertise, and long-term scalability needs when making your final decision.

When to Choose Each Tool

When to Choose Augment

Augment is the better choice when you prioritize broader platform support (3 vs 2 platforms). Augment supports 3 platforms compared to Cody by Sourcegraph's 2, making it ideal for teams with specific requirements.

Ideal for:

  • Budget-conscious teams—Augment offers a free tier for testing, while Cody by Sourcegraph requires a paid subscription
  • Cross-platform access—Augment works across 3 platforms, while Cody by Sourcegraph is more limited
  • Multilingual support—Augment supports 6 languages vs Cody by Sourcegraph's 4
  • Unique features—Augment offers code augmentation and code generation capabilities not found in Cody by Sourcegraph

Target Audiences:

Software Developers
Product Managers
Business Executives
Entrepreneurs

When to Choose Cody by Sourcegraph

Cody by Sourcegraph excels when you need specific features and capabilities. Cody by Sourcegraph making it ideal for teams with specific requirements.

Ideal for:

  • Advanced analytics—Cody by Sourcegraph provides deeper insights and data visualization capabilities
  • Specialized in productivity & collaboration—Cody by Sourcegraph offers category-specific features and optimizations for productivity & collaboration workflows
  • AI-powered capabilities—Cody by Sourcegraph highlights advanced AI features: "Accelerate code review with AI assistance"
  • Unique features—Cody by Sourcegraph offers code search and code intelligence capabilities not found in Augment

Target Audiences:

Software Developers
Product Managers
Business Executives
Entrepreneurs

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Augment

Value Proposition

Freemium model allows gradual scaling without upfront commitment. Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage. Multi-platform support reduces need for multiple tool subscriptions.

ROI Considerations

  • Single tool replaces multiple platform-specific solutions

Cody by Sourcegraph

Value Proposition

Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage.

ROI Considerations

    Cost Analysis Tip: Beyond sticker price, consider total cost of ownership including setup time, training, integration complexity, and potential vendor lock-in. Tools with free tiers allow risk-free evaluation, while usage-based pricing aligns costs with value. Factor in productivity gains, reduced manual work, and improved outcomes when calculating ROI.

    Who Should Use Each Tool?

    Augment is Best For

    • Software Developers
    • Product Managers
    • Business Executives
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Educators

    Cody by Sourcegraph is Best For

    • Software Developers
    • Product Managers
    • Business Executives
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Educators

    Pricing Comparison

    Augment
    Best Value

    Pricing Model

    Freemium, Enterprise

    Details

    Four public tiers: Community (Free, up to 50 user messages with $10 per 100 extra messages), Developer ($50/month, up to 600 messages), Pro ($100/month, up to 1,500 messages), Max ($250/month, up to 4,500 messages), plus Enterprise (custom). All paid plans allow extra user messages at $10 per 100. Pricing now charges by successful user messages. 14-day free trial available for Developer plan.

    Estimated Monthly Cost

    $+/month

    Cody by Sourcegraph

    Pricing Model

    Enterprise, Contact for Pricing

    Details

    As of July 23, 2025, Cody Free and Cody Pro plans have been discontinued, and Cody is no longer included in the Enterprise Starter plan. Only Cody Enterprise is available, targeting large organizations; pricing is seat-based or token-based, typically requires contacting sales.

    Estimated Monthly Cost

    $+/month

    Strengths & Weaknesses

    Augment

    Strengths

    • Free tier available
    • Multi-platform support (3 platforms)
    • Developer-friendly (2+ SDKs)
    • Highly rated (5.0⭐)

    Limitations

    • Few integrations
    • Not GDPR compliant
    • No public API

    Cody by Sourcegraph

    Strengths

    • Developer-friendly (2+ SDKs)

    Limitations

    • No free tier
    • Few integrations
    • Not GDPR compliant
    • No public API

    Community Verdict

    Augment

    5.0(1 ratings)
    16 community upvotes

    Cody by Sourcegraph

    4.0(1 ratings)
    9 community upvotes

    Integration & Compatibility Comparison

    Augment

    Platform Support

    Web App
    CLI Tool
    API

    ✓ Multi-platform support enables flexible deployment

    Integrations

    AI Enum Mapper

    Developer Tools

    SDK Support:

    Python
    JavaScript/TypeScript

    Cody by Sourcegraph

    Platform Support

    Web App
    Plugin/Integration

    Integrations

    Limited integration options

    Developer Tools

    SDK Support:

    Python
    JavaScript/TypeScript

    Integration Evaluation: Assess how each tool fits into your existing stack. Consider API availability for custom integrations if native options are limited. Evaluate integration depth, authentication methods (OAuth, API keys), webhook support, and data synchronization capabilities. Test integrations in your environment before committing.

    Developer Experience

    Augment

    SDK Support

    Python
    JavaScript/TypeScript

    Cody by Sourcegraph

    SDK Support

    Python
    JavaScript/TypeScript

    Deployment & Security

    Augment

    Deployment Options

    Cloud

    Compliance

    GDPR status not specified

    Hosting

    Global

    Cody by Sourcegraph

    Deployment Options

    Cloud

    Compliance

    GDPR status not specified

    Hosting

    Global

    Common Use Cases

    Augment

    code augmentation
    code generation
    software development
    automation
    AI tool
    code enhancement
    productivity tool
    programming assistance
    code completion
    developer tool

    Cody by Sourcegraph

    code search
    code intelligence
    code navigation
    code review
    code insights
    code analysis
    code monitoring
    code collaboration
    code automation
    developer productivity

    +2 more use cases available

    Making Your Final Decision

    Choosing between Augment and Cody by Sourcegraph ultimately depends on your specific requirements, team size, budget constraints, and long-term goals. Both tools offer unique strengths that may align differently with your workflow.

    Consider Augment if:

    • Budget-conscious teams—Augment offers a free tier for testing, while Cody by Sourcegraph requires a paid subscription
    • Cross-platform access—Augment works across 3 platforms, while Cody by Sourcegraph is more limited
    • Multilingual support—Augment supports 6 languages vs Cody by Sourcegraph's 4

    Consider Cody by Sourcegraph if:

    • Advanced analytics—Cody by Sourcegraph provides deeper insights and data visualization capabilities
    • Specialized in productivity & collaboration—Cody by Sourcegraph offers category-specific features and optimizations for productivity & collaboration workflows
    • AI-powered capabilities—Cody by Sourcegraph highlights advanced AI features: "Accelerate code review with AI assistance"

    Next Steps

    1. Start with free trials: Both tools likely offer free tiers or trial periods. Use these to test real workflows and evaluate performance firsthand.
    2. Involve your team: Get feedback from actual users who will interact with the tool daily. Their input on usability and workflow integration is invaluable.
    3. Test integrations: Verify that each tool integrates smoothly with your existing stack. Check API documentation, webhook support, and authentication methods.
    4. Calculate total cost: Look beyond monthly pricing. Factor in setup time, training, potential overages, and long-term scalability costs.
    5. Review support and roadmap: Evaluate vendor responsiveness, documentation quality, and product roadmap alignment with your needs.

    Remember: The "best" tool is the one that fits your specific context. What works for one organization may not work for another. Take your time, test thoroughly, and choose based on verified data rather than marketing claims. Both Augment and Cody by Sourcegraph are capable solutions—your job is to determine which aligns better with your unique requirements.

    Top Code Assistance tools

    Explore by audience

    FAQ

    Is Augment better than Cody by Sourcegraph for Code Assistance?

    There isn’t a universal winner—decide by fit. Check: (1) Workflow/UI alignment; (2) Total cost at your usage (seats, limits, add‑ons); (3) Integration coverage and API quality; (4) Data handling and compliance. Use the table above to align these with your priorities.

    What are alternatives to Augment and Cody by Sourcegraph?

    Explore adjacent options in the Code Assistance category. Shortlist by feature depth, integration maturity, transparent pricing, migration ease (export/API), security posture (e.g., SOC 2/ISO 27001), and roadmap velocity. Prefer tools proven in production in stacks similar to yours and with clear SLAs/support.

    What should I look for in Code Assistance tools?

    Checklist: (1) Must‑have vs nice‑to‑have features; (2) Cost at your scale (limits, overages, seats); (3) Integrations and API quality; (4) Privacy & compliance (GDPR/DSA, retention, residency); (5) Reliability/performance (SLA, throughput, rate limits); (6) Admin, audit, SSO; (7) Support and roadmap. Validate with a fast pilot on your real workloads.

    How should I compare pricing for Augment vs Cody by Sourcegraph?

    Normalize to your usage. Model seats, limits, overages, add‑ons, and support. Include hidden costs: implementation, training, migration, and potential lock‑in. Prefer transparent metering if predictability matters.

    What due diligence is essential before choosing a Code Assistance tool?

    Run a structured pilot: (1) Replicate a real workflow; (2) Measure quality and latency; (3) Verify integrations, API limits, error handling; (4) Review security, PII handling, compliance, and data residency; (5) Confirm SLA, support response, and roadmap.