Augment vs Tabnine
Neutral, data‑driven comparison to evaluate code assistance.
Comparing 2 AI tools.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Upvotes | 16 | 9 |
Avg. Rating | 4.7 | 4.0 |
Slogan | AI coding platform for real software | AI Code Completion |
Category | ||
Pricing Model | Freemium Enterprise | Subscription Enterprise Contact for Pricing |
Monthly Pricing (USD) | $0 – $200 / month Min$0 / month Mid$60 / month Max$200 / month Free tier | N/A |
Pricing Details | Trial (Free, 30,000 credits), Indie $20/month (40,000 credits), Standard $60/month (130,000 credits), Max $200/month (450,000 credits), Enterprise (Custom). Credit-based pricing since October 20, 2025. | Tabnine Basic (Free) was discontinued April 2025. As of August 2025, Tabnine offers: Dev plan at $9/user/month or $99/year, Enterprise plan at $39/user/month (evaluation available via sales). No ongoing permanent free plan; short-term free trials only. |
Platforms | ||
Target Audience | Software Developers, Product Managers, Business Executives, Entrepreneurs | Software Developers, Scientists, Content Creators, Product Managers, Entrepreneurs, Educators, Students, Remote Workers |
Website |
Why this comparison matters
This comprehensive comparison of Augment and Tabnine provides objective, data-driven insights to help you choose the best code assistance solution for your needs. We evaluate both tools across multiple dimensions including feature depth, pricing transparency, integration capabilities, security posture, and real-world usability.
Whether you're evaluating tools for personal use, team collaboration, or enterprise deployment, this comparison highlights key differentiators, use case recommendations, and cost-benefit considerations to inform your decision. Both tools are evaluated based on verified data, community feedback, and technical capabilities.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Augment if:
- Budget-conscious teams—Augment offers a free tier for testing, while Tabnine requires a paid subscription
- Enterprise-ready—Augment offers enterprise-grade features, SSO, and dedicated support
- Automation powerhouse—Augment excels at workflow automation and reducing manual tasks
- Multilingual support—Augment supports 6 languages vs Tabnine's 1
- Unique features—Augment offers ai coding assistant and autonomous coding agents capabilities not found in Tabnine
Choose Tabnine if:
- Multi-platform flexibility—Tabnine supports 4 platforms (2 more than Augment), ideal for diverse teams
- Universal access—Tabnine runs in any browser, no installation required
- Mobile-first workflows—Tabnine offers native mobile apps for on-the-go access
- Unique features—Tabnine offers code completion and ai-powered capabilities not found in Augment
Pro tip: Start with a free trial or free tier if available. Test both tools with real workflows to evaluate performance, ease of use, and integration depth. Consider your team size, technical expertise, and long-term scalability needs when making your final decision.
When to Choose Each Tool
When to Choose Augment
Augment is the better choice when you prioritize specific features and capabilities. Augment making it ideal for enterprise users requiring robust features.
Ideal for:
- Budget-conscious teams—Augment offers a free tier for testing, while Tabnine requires a paid subscription
- Enterprise-ready—Augment offers enterprise-grade features, SSO, and dedicated support
- Automation powerhouse—Augment excels at workflow automation and reducing manual tasks
- Multilingual support—Augment supports 6 languages vs Tabnine's 1
- Unique features—Augment offers ai coding assistant and autonomous coding agents capabilities not found in Tabnine
Target Audiences:
When to Choose Tabnine
Tabnine excels when you need broader platform support (4 vs 2 platforms). Tabnine supports 4 platforms compared to Augment's 2, making it ideal for teams with specific requirements.
Ideal for:
- Multi-platform flexibility—Tabnine supports 4 platforms (2 more than Augment), ideal for diverse teams
- Universal access—Tabnine runs in any browser, no installation required
- Mobile-first workflows—Tabnine offers native mobile apps for on-the-go access
- Unique features—Tabnine offers code completion and ai-powered capabilities not found in Augment
Target Audiences:
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Augment
Value Proposition
Freemium model allows gradual scaling without upfront commitment. Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage.
ROI Considerations
Tabnine
Value Proposition
Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage. Multi-platform support reduces need for multiple tool subscriptions.
ROI Considerations
- Single tool replaces multiple platform-specific solutions
Cost Analysis Tip: Beyond sticker price, consider total cost of ownership including setup time, training, integration complexity, and potential vendor lock-in. Tools with free tiers allow risk-free evaluation, while usage-based pricing aligns costs with value. Factor in productivity gains, reduced manual work, and improved outcomes when calculating ROI.
Who Should Use Each Tool?
Augment is Best For
- Software Developers
- Product Managers
- Business Executives
- Entrepreneurs
Tabnine is Best For
- Software Developers
- Scientists
- Content Creators
- Product Managers
- Entrepreneurs
Pricing Comparison
AugmentBest Value
Pricing Model
Freemium, Enterprise
Details
Trial (Free, 30,000 credits), Indie $20/month (40,000 credits), Standard $60/month (130,000 credits), Max $200/month (450,000 credits), Enterprise (Custom). Credit-based pricing since October 20, 2025.
Estimated Monthly Cost
$0 - $200/month
Tabnine
Pricing Model
Subscription, Enterprise, Contact for Pricing
Details
Tabnine Basic (Free) was discontinued April 2025. As of August 2025, Tabnine offers: Dev plan at $9/user/month or $99/year, Enterprise plan at $39/user/month (evaluation available via sales). No ongoing permanent free plan; short-term free trials only.
Estimated Monthly Cost
$+/month
Strengths & Weaknesses
Augment
Strengths
- Free tier available
- Developer-friendly (2+ SDKs)
- Highly rated (4.7⭐)
Limitations
- Few integrations
- Not GDPR compliant
- No public API
Tabnine
Strengths
- Multi-platform support (4 platforms)
- Developer-friendly (12+ SDKs)
Limitations
- No free tier
- Few integrations
- Not GDPR compliant
- No public API
Community Verdict
Augment
Tabnine
Integration & Compatibility Comparison
Augment
Platform Support
Integrations
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
Tabnine
Platform Support
✓ Multi-platform support enables flexible deployment
Integrations
Limited integration options
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
Integration Evaluation: Assess how each tool fits into your existing stack. Consider API availability for custom integrations if native options are limited. Evaluate integration depth, authentication methods (OAuth, API keys), webhook support, and data synchronization capabilities. Test integrations in your environment before committing.
Developer Experience
Augment
SDK Support
Tabnine
SDK Support
Deployment & Security
Augment
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
Tabnine
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
Common Use Cases
Augment
+6 more use cases available
Tabnine
Making Your Final Decision
Choosing between Augment and Tabnine ultimately depends on your specific requirements, team size, budget constraints, and long-term goals. Both tools offer unique strengths that may align differently with your workflow.
Consider Augment if:
- •Budget-conscious teams—Augment offers a free tier for testing, while Tabnine requires a paid subscription
- •Enterprise-ready—Augment offers enterprise-grade features, SSO, and dedicated support
- •Automation powerhouse—Augment excels at workflow automation and reducing manual tasks
Consider Tabnine if:
- •Multi-platform flexibility—Tabnine supports 4 platforms (2 more than Augment), ideal for diverse teams
- •Universal access—Tabnine runs in any browser, no installation required
- •Mobile-first workflows—Tabnine offers native mobile apps for on-the-go access
Next Steps
- Start with free trials: Both tools likely offer free tiers or trial periods. Use these to test real workflows and evaluate performance firsthand.
- Involve your team: Get feedback from actual users who will interact with the tool daily. Their input on usability and workflow integration is invaluable.
- Test integrations: Verify that each tool integrates smoothly with your existing stack. Check API documentation, webhook support, and authentication methods.
- Calculate total cost: Look beyond monthly pricing. Factor in setup time, training, potential overages, and long-term scalability costs.
- Review support and roadmap: Evaluate vendor responsiveness, documentation quality, and product roadmap alignment with your needs.
Remember: The "best" tool is the one that fits your specific context. What works for one organization may not work for another. Take your time, test thoroughly, and choose based on verified data rather than marketing claims. Both Augment and Tabnine are capable solutions—your job is to determine which aligns better with your unique requirements.
Top Code Assistance tools
- 4Windsurf (ex Codium)Free tier
Tomorrow’s editor, today. The first agent-powered IDE built for developer flow.
- 6GitHub CopilotFree tier
Your AI pair programmer and autonomous coding agent
Web AppDesktop AppMobile App#coding agent#autonomous coding#pull request automation4.0(5)391Integrations: 1
Explore by audience
Missing a comparison feature?
Help us improve by suggesting what you'd like to compare
FAQ
Is Augment better than Tabnine for Code Assistance?
There isn’t a universal winner—decide by fit. Check: (1) Workflow/UI alignment; (2) Total cost at your usage (seats, limits, add‑ons); (3) Integration coverage and API quality; (4) Data handling and compliance. Use the table above to align these with your priorities.
What are alternatives to Augment and Tabnine?
Explore adjacent options in the Code Assistance category. Shortlist by feature depth, integration maturity, transparent pricing, migration ease (export/API), security posture (e.g., SOC 2/ISO 27001), and roadmap velocity. Prefer tools proven in production in stacks similar to yours and with clear SLAs/support.
What should I look for in Code Assistance tools?
Checklist: (1) Must‑have vs nice‑to‑have features; (2) Cost at your scale (limits, overages, seats); (3) Integrations and API quality; (4) Privacy & compliance (GDPR/DSA, retention, residency); (5) Reliability/performance (SLA, throughput, rate limits); (6) Admin, audit, SSO; (7) Support and roadmap. Validate with a fast pilot on your real workloads.
How should I compare pricing for Augment vs Tabnine?
Normalize to your usage. Model seats, limits, overages, add‑ons, and support. Include hidden costs: implementation, training, migration, and potential lock‑in. Prefer transparent metering if predictability matters.
What due diligence is essential before choosing a Code Assistance tool?
Run a structured pilot: (1) Replicate a real workflow; (2) Measure quality and latency; (3) Verify integrations, API limits, error handling; (4) Review security, PII handling, compliance, and data residency; (5) Confirm SLA, support response, and roadmap.