Miro vs Modelfy 3D
Neutral, data‑driven comparison to evaluate design.
Comparing 2 AI tools.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Upvotes | 133 | 0 |
Avg. Rating | 4.3 | N/A |
Slogan | The visual workspace for innovation | N/A |
Category | ||
Pricing Model | Freemium Enterprise | Subscription One-time Purchase |
Monthly Pricing (USD) | $0 – $20 / month Min$0 / month Mid$10 / month Max$20 / month Free tier | N/A |
Pricing Details | Free tier with 3 boards and unlimited team members, Starter at $8/user/month (annual billing) or $10/user/month (monthly billing), Business at $16/user/month (annual billing) or $20/user/month (monthly billing), Enterprise plan requires contacting sales for custom pricing | N/A |
Platforms | ||
Target Audience | Software Developers, Product Managers, Business Executives, Educators, Students, Remote Workers, Entrepreneurs, Graphic Designers | Marketing Professionals, Human Resources Professionals |
Website |
Why this comparison matters
This comprehensive comparison of Miro and Modelfy 3D provides objective, data-driven insights to help you choose the best design solution for your needs. We evaluate both tools across multiple dimensions including feature depth, pricing transparency, integration capabilities, security posture, and real-world usability.
Whether you're evaluating tools for personal use, team collaboration, or enterprise deployment, this comparison highlights key differentiators, use case recommendations, and cost-benefit considerations to inform your decision. Both tools are evaluated based on verified data, community feedback, and technical capabilities.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Miro if:
- Budget-conscious teams—Miro offers a free tier for testing, while Modelfy 3D requires a paid subscription
- Multi-platform flexibility—Miro supports 6 platforms (4 more than Modelfy 3D), ideal for diverse teams
- Developer-friendly—Miro provides comprehensive API and 1 SDKs for custom integrations, while Modelfy 3D has limited developer tools
- Built for developers—Miro is designed specifically for technical teams with advanced features and API-first architecture
- Automation powerhouse—Miro excels at workflow automation and reducing manual tasks
Choose Modelfy 3D if:
- Variable usage patterns—Modelfy 3D offers pay-as-you-go pricing, ideal for fluctuating workloads
- Modelfy 3D specializes in 3D Generation, offering category-specific features
- Modelfy 3D focuses on image to 3d, providing specialized capabilities
Pro tip: Start with a free trial or free tier if available. Test both tools with real workflows to evaluate performance, ease of use, and integration depth. Consider your team size, technical expertise, and long-term scalability needs when making your final decision.
When to Choose Each Tool
When to Choose Miro
Miro is the better choice when you prioritize broader platform support (6 vs 2 platforms). Miro supports 6 platforms compared to Modelfy 3D's 2, making it ideal for development teams needing technical depth.
Ideal for:
- Budget-conscious teams—Miro offers a free tier for testing, while Modelfy 3D requires a paid subscription
- Multi-platform flexibility—Miro supports 6 platforms (4 more than Modelfy 3D), ideal for diverse teams
- Developer-friendly—Miro provides comprehensive API and 1 SDKs for custom integrations, while Modelfy 3D has limited developer tools
- Built for developers—Miro is designed specifically for technical teams with advanced features and API-first architecture
- Automation powerhouse—Miro excels at workflow automation and reducing manual tasks
Target Audiences:
When to Choose Modelfy 3D
Modelfy 3D excels when you need specific features and capabilities. Modelfy 3D making it ideal for teams with specific requirements.
Ideal for:
- Variable usage patterns—Modelfy 3D offers pay-as-you-go pricing, ideal for fluctuating workloads
- Modelfy 3D specializes in 3D Generation, offering category-specific features
- Modelfy 3D focuses on image to 3d, providing specialized capabilities
Target Audiences:
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Miro
Value Proposition
Freemium model allows gradual scaling without upfront commitment. Multi-platform support reduces need for multiple tool subscriptions. API and SDK access enable custom automation, reducing manual work.
ROI Considerations
- Single tool replaces multiple platform-specific solutions
- API access enables automation, reducing manual work
Modelfy 3D
Value Proposition
Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage.
ROI Considerations
Cost Analysis Tip: Beyond sticker price, consider total cost of ownership including setup time, training, integration complexity, and potential vendor lock-in. Tools with free tiers allow risk-free evaluation, while usage-based pricing aligns costs with value. Factor in productivity gains, reduced manual work, and improved outcomes when calculating ROI.
Who Should Use Each Tool?
Miro is Best For
- Software Developers
- Product Managers
- Business Executives
- Educators
- Students
Modelfy 3D is Best For
- Marketing Professionals
- Human Resources Professionals
Pricing Comparison
MiroBest Value
Pricing Model
Freemium, Enterprise
Details
Free tier with 3 boards and unlimited team members, Starter at $8/user/month (annual billing) or $10/user/month (monthly billing), Business at $16/user/month (annual billing) or $20/user/month (monthly billing), Enterprise plan requires contacting sales for custom pricing
Estimated Monthly Cost
$0 - $20/month
Modelfy 3D
Pricing Model
Subscription, One-time Purchase
Strengths & Weaknesses
Miro
Strengths
- Free tier available
- Multi-platform support (6 platforms)
- API available
Limitations
- Few integrations
- Not GDPR compliant
Modelfy 3D
Strengths
Limitations
- No free tier
- Few integrations
- Not GDPR compliant
- No public API
- No SDK support
Community Verdict
Miro
Modelfy 3D
Integration & Compatibility Comparison
Miro
Platform Support
✓ Multi-platform support enables flexible deployment
Integrations
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
✓ REST API available for custom integrations
Modelfy 3D
Platform Support
Integrations
Limited integration options
Integration Evaluation: Assess how each tool fits into your existing stack. Consider API availability for custom integrations if native options are limited. Evaluate integration depth, authentication methods (OAuth, API keys), webhook support, and data synchronization capabilities. Test integrations in your environment before committing.
Developer Experience
Miro
SDK Support
API
✅ REST API available
Modelfy 3D
No SDK or API information available
Deployment & Security
Miro
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
Modelfy 3D
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Common Use Cases
Miro
+7 more use cases available
Modelfy 3D
Making Your Final Decision
Choosing between Miro and Modelfy 3D ultimately depends on your specific requirements, team size, budget constraints, and long-term goals. Both tools offer unique strengths that may align differently with your workflow.
Consider Miro if:
- •Budget-conscious teams—Miro offers a free tier for testing, while Modelfy 3D requires a paid subscription
- •Multi-platform flexibility—Miro supports 6 platforms (4 more than Modelfy 3D), ideal for diverse teams
- •Developer-friendly—Miro provides comprehensive API and 1 SDKs for custom integrations, while Modelfy 3D has limited developer tools
Consider Modelfy 3D if:
- •Variable usage patterns—Modelfy 3D offers pay-as-you-go pricing, ideal for fluctuating workloads
- •Modelfy 3D specializes in 3D Generation, offering category-specific features
- •Modelfy 3D focuses on image to 3d, providing specialized capabilities
Next Steps
- Start with free trials: Both tools likely offer free tiers or trial periods. Use these to test real workflows and evaluate performance firsthand.
- Involve your team: Get feedback from actual users who will interact with the tool daily. Their input on usability and workflow integration is invaluable.
- Test integrations: Verify that each tool integrates smoothly with your existing stack. Check API documentation, webhook support, and authentication methods.
- Calculate total cost: Look beyond monthly pricing. Factor in setup time, training, potential overages, and long-term scalability costs.
- Review support and roadmap: Evaluate vendor responsiveness, documentation quality, and product roadmap alignment with your needs.
Remember: The "best" tool is the one that fits your specific context. What works for one organization may not work for another. Take your time, test thoroughly, and choose based on verified data rather than marketing claims. Both Miro and Modelfy 3D are capable solutions—your job is to determine which aligns better with your unique requirements.
Top Design tools
- 1Freepik AI Image GeneratorFree tier
Generate on-brand AI images from text, sketches, or photos—fast, realistic, and ready for commercial use.
Explore by audience
FAQ
Is Miro better than Modelfy 3D for Design?
There isn’t a universal winner—decide by fit. Check: (1) Workflow/UI alignment; (2) Total cost at your usage (seats, limits, add‑ons); (3) Integration coverage and API quality; (4) Data handling and compliance. Use the table above to align these with your priorities.
What are alternatives to Miro and Modelfy 3D?
Explore adjacent options in the Design category. Shortlist by feature depth, integration maturity, transparent pricing, migration ease (export/API), security posture (e.g., SOC 2/ISO 27001), and roadmap velocity. Prefer tools proven in production in stacks similar to yours and with clear SLAs/support.
What should I look for in Design tools?
Checklist: (1) Must‑have vs nice‑to‑have features; (2) Cost at your scale (limits, overages, seats); (3) Integrations and API quality; (4) Privacy & compliance (GDPR/DSA, retention, residency); (5) Reliability/performance (SLA, throughput, rate limits); (6) Admin, audit, SSO; (7) Support and roadmap. Validate with a fast pilot on your real workloads.
How should I compare pricing for Miro vs Modelfy 3D?
Normalize to your usage. Model seats, limits, overages, add‑ons, and support. Include hidden costs: implementation, training, migration, and potential lock‑in. Prefer transparent metering if predictability matters.
What due diligence is essential before choosing a Design tool?
Run a structured pilot: (1) Replicate a real workflow; (2) Measure quality and latency; (3) Verify integrations, API limits, error handling; (4) Review security, PII handling, compliance, and data residency; (5) Confirm SLA, support response, and roadmap.