Bolt.new vs ScrapeGraphAI
Neutral, data‑driven comparison to evaluate code assistance.
Comparing 2 AI tools.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Upvotes | 100 | 2 |
Avg. Rating | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Slogan | Build, edit, and deploy full-stack web apps from natural language—AI-powered in your browser. | Transform web and document data into actionable insights with AI-driven, flexible scraping. |
Category | ||
Pricing Model | Freemium Pay-per-Use Enterprise Contact for Pricing | Freemium Enterprise Contact for Pricing |
Pricing Details | Free plan with 1M tokens/month, Pro plans from $20/month (10M tokens), scale to $200/month (120M tokens); higher tiers up to $2000/month; pay-per-use token packs; Enterprise/custom options available | Free includes 50 credits/month; Starter at $20/month, Growth at $80/month, Pro at $500/month; higher or custom tiers available on request. |
Platforms | ||
Target Audience | Software Developers, Entrepreneurs, Product Managers, Content Creators | Software Developers, Entrepreneurs, Business Executives, AI Enthusiasts, Scientists |
Website |
Why this comparison matters
This comprehensive comparison of Bolt.new and ScrapeGraphAI provides objective, data-driven insights to help you choose the best code assistance solution for your needs. We evaluate both tools across multiple dimensions including feature depth, pricing transparency, integration capabilities, security posture, and real-world usability.
Whether you're evaluating tools for personal use, team collaboration, or enterprise deployment, this comparison highlights key differentiators, use case recommendations, and cost-benefit considerations to inform your decision. Both tools are evaluated based on verified data, community feedback, and technical capabilities.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Bolt.new if:
- Community favorite—Bolt.new has 100 upvotes (4900% more than ScrapeGraphAI), indicating strong user preference
- Multilingual support—Bolt.new supports 10 languages vs ScrapeGraphAI's 1
- Unique features—Bolt.new offers ai code generation and natural language programming capabilities not found in ScrapeGraphAI
Choose ScrapeGraphAI if:
- Open source transparency—ScrapeGraphAI provides full code access and community-driven development
- Enterprise-ready—ScrapeGraphAI offers enterprise-grade features, SSO, and dedicated support
- Automation powerhouse—ScrapeGraphAI excels at workflow automation and reducing manual tasks
- Advanced analytics—ScrapeGraphAI provides deeper insights and data visualization capabilities
- Specialized in data analytics—ScrapeGraphAI offers category-specific features and optimizations for data analytics workflows
Pro tip: Start with a free trial or free tier if available. Test both tools with real workflows to evaluate performance, ease of use, and integration depth. Consider your team size, technical expertise, and long-term scalability needs when making your final decision.
When to Choose Each Tool
When to Choose Bolt.new
Bolt.new is the better choice when you prioritize specific features and capabilities. Bolt.new making it ideal for teams valuing community-validated solutions.
Ideal for:
- Community favorite—Bolt.new has 100 upvotes (4900% more than ScrapeGraphAI), indicating strong user preference
- Multilingual support—Bolt.new supports 10 languages vs ScrapeGraphAI's 1
- Unique features—Bolt.new offers ai code generation and natural language programming capabilities not found in ScrapeGraphAI
Target Audiences:
When to Choose ScrapeGraphAI
ScrapeGraphAI excels when you need open source transparency. ScrapeGraphAI making it ideal for enterprise users requiring robust features.
Ideal for:
- Open source transparency—ScrapeGraphAI provides full code access and community-driven development
- Enterprise-ready—ScrapeGraphAI offers enterprise-grade features, SSO, and dedicated support
- Automation powerhouse—ScrapeGraphAI excels at workflow automation and reducing manual tasks
- Advanced analytics—ScrapeGraphAI provides deeper insights and data visualization capabilities
- Specialized in data analytics—ScrapeGraphAI offers category-specific features and optimizations for data analytics workflows
Target Audiences:
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Bolt.new
Value Proposition
Freemium model allows gradual scaling without upfront commitment. Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage. API and SDK access enable custom automation, reducing manual work.
ROI Considerations
- API access enables automation, reducing manual work
ScrapeGraphAI
Value Proposition
Freemium model allows gradual scaling without upfront commitment. Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage. API and SDK access enable custom automation, reducing manual work.
ROI Considerations
- API access enables automation, reducing manual work
Cost Analysis Tip: Beyond sticker price, consider total cost of ownership including setup time, training, integration complexity, and potential vendor lock-in. Tools with free tiers allow risk-free evaluation, while usage-based pricing aligns costs with value. Factor in productivity gains, reduced manual work, and improved outcomes when calculating ROI.
Who Should Use Each Tool?
Bolt.new is Best For
- Software Developers
- Entrepreneurs
- Product Managers
- Content Creators
ScrapeGraphAI is Best For
- Software Developers
- Entrepreneurs
- Business Executives
- AI Enthusiasts
- Scientists
Pricing Comparison
Bolt.new
Pricing Model
Freemium, Pay-per-Use, Enterprise, Contact for Pricing
Details
Free plan with 1M tokens/month, Pro plans from $20/month (10M tokens), scale to $200/month (120M tokens); higher tiers up to $2000/month; pay-per-use token packs; Enterprise/custom options available
Estimated Monthly Cost
$+/month
ScrapeGraphAI
Pricing Model
Freemium, Enterprise, Contact for Pricing
Details
Free includes 50 credits/month; Starter at $20/month, Growth at $80/month, Pro at $500/month; higher or custom tiers available on request.
Estimated Monthly Cost
$+/month
Strengths & Weaknesses
Bolt.new
Strengths
- Free tier available
- Developer-friendly (2+ SDKs)
- API available
Limitations
- Few integrations
- Not GDPR compliant
ScrapeGraphAI
Strengths
- Free tier available
- Open source
- Developer-friendly (2+ SDKs)
- API available
Limitations
- Few integrations
- Not GDPR compliant
Community Verdict
Bolt.new
ScrapeGraphAI
Integration & Compatibility Comparison
Bolt.new
Platform Support
Integrations
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
✓ REST API available for custom integrations
ScrapeGraphAI
Platform Support
Integrations
Limited integration options
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
✓ REST API available for custom integrations
Integration Evaluation: Assess how each tool fits into your existing stack. Consider API availability for custom integrations if native options are limited. Evaluate integration depth, authentication methods (OAuth, API keys), webhook support, and data synchronization capabilities. Test integrations in your environment before committing.
Developer Experience
Bolt.new
SDK Support
API
✅ REST API available
ScrapeGraphAI
SDK Support
API
✅ REST API available
Deployment & Security
Bolt.new
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
ScrapeGraphAI
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
Common Use Cases
Bolt.new
+9 more use cases available
ScrapeGraphAI
+10 more use cases available
Making Your Final Decision
Choosing between Bolt.new and ScrapeGraphAI ultimately depends on your specific requirements, team size, budget constraints, and long-term goals. Both tools offer unique strengths that may align differently with your workflow.
Consider Bolt.new if:
- •Community favorite—Bolt.new has 100 upvotes (4900% more than ScrapeGraphAI), indicating strong user preference
- •Multilingual support—Bolt.new supports 10 languages vs ScrapeGraphAI's 1
- •Unique features—Bolt.new offers ai code generation and natural language programming capabilities not found in ScrapeGraphAI
Consider ScrapeGraphAI if:
- •Open source transparency—ScrapeGraphAI provides full code access and community-driven development
- •Enterprise-ready—ScrapeGraphAI offers enterprise-grade features, SSO, and dedicated support
- •Automation powerhouse—ScrapeGraphAI excels at workflow automation and reducing manual tasks
Next Steps
- Start with free trials: Both tools likely offer free tiers or trial periods. Use these to test real workflows and evaluate performance firsthand.
- Involve your team: Get feedback from actual users who will interact with the tool daily. Their input on usability and workflow integration is invaluable.
- Test integrations: Verify that each tool integrates smoothly with your existing stack. Check API documentation, webhook support, and authentication methods.
- Calculate total cost: Look beyond monthly pricing. Factor in setup time, training, potential overages, and long-term scalability costs.
- Review support and roadmap: Evaluate vendor responsiveness, documentation quality, and product roadmap alignment with your needs.
Remember: The "best" tool is the one that fits your specific context. What works for one organization may not work for another. Take your time, test thoroughly, and choose based on verified data rather than marketing claims. Both Bolt.new and ScrapeGraphAI are capable solutions—your job is to determine which aligns better with your unique requirements.
Top Code Assistance tools
- 4GitHub CopilotFree tier
Your AI pair programmer
Web AppDesktop AppMobile App#ai code assistant#code completion#automated code generation4.0(2)391Integrations: 1
Explore by audience
FAQ
Is Bolt.new better than ScrapeGraphAI for Code Assistance?
There isn’t a universal winner—decide by fit. Check: (1) Workflow/UI alignment; (2) Total cost at your usage (seats, limits, add‑ons); (3) Integration coverage and API quality; (4) Data handling and compliance. Use the table above to align these with your priorities.
What are alternatives to Bolt.new and ScrapeGraphAI?
Explore adjacent options in the Code Assistance category. Shortlist by feature depth, integration maturity, transparent pricing, migration ease (export/API), security posture (e.g., SOC 2/ISO 27001), and roadmap velocity. Prefer tools proven in production in stacks similar to yours and with clear SLAs/support.
What should I look for in Code Assistance tools?
Checklist: (1) Must‑have vs nice‑to‑have features; (2) Cost at your scale (limits, overages, seats); (3) Integrations and API quality; (4) Privacy & compliance (GDPR/DSA, retention, residency); (5) Reliability/performance (SLA, throughput, rate limits); (6) Admin, audit, SSO; (7) Support and roadmap. Validate with a fast pilot on your real workloads.
How should I compare pricing for Bolt.new vs ScrapeGraphAI?
Normalize to your usage. Model seats, limits, overages, add‑ons, and support. Include hidden costs: implementation, training, migration, and potential lock‑in. Prefer transparent metering if predictability matters.
What due diligence is essential before choosing a Code Assistance tool?
Run a structured pilot: (1) Replicate a real workflow; (2) Measure quality and latency; (3) Verify integrations, API limits, error handling; (4) Review security, PII handling, compliance, and data residency; (5) Confirm SLA, support response, and roadmap.