ActiveCampaign vs Miro
Neutral, data‑driven comparison to evaluate productivity & collaboration.
Comparing 2 AI tools.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Upvotes | 13 | 133 |
Avg. Rating | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Slogan | Marketing Automation for Growing Businesses | The visual workspace for innovation |
Category | ||
Pricing Model | Freemium Enterprise Contact for Pricing | Freemium Enterprise Contact for Pricing |
Pricing Details | ActiveCampaign offers a 14-day free trial, followed by tiered subscription plans: Starter (from $15/month), Plus (from $49/month), Pro (from $79/month), and Enterprise (from $145/month). The exact price depends on the number of contacts. Enterprise plans require contacting sales for custom pricing. There is no freemium plan; only a free trial is available. | Free plan offers basic features with 3 boards. Starter at $8/user/month (annually), $10/month (monthly); Business at $16/user/month (annually), $20/month (monthly); Enterprise plan requires contacting Miro for custom pricing, typically for 30+ users. All tiers can be billed monthly at a higher rate. |
Platforms | ||
Target Audience | Marketing Professionals, Business Executives, Entrepreneurs, Remote Workers | Software Developers, Product Managers, Business Executives, Educators, Students, Remote Workers, Entrepreneurs |
Website |
Why this comparison matters
This comprehensive comparison of ActiveCampaign and Miro provides objective, data-driven insights to help you choose the best productivity & collaboration solution for your needs. We evaluate both tools across multiple dimensions including feature depth, pricing transparency, integration capabilities, security posture, and real-world usability.
Whether you're evaluating tools for personal use, team collaboration, or enterprise deployment, this comparison highlights key differentiators, use case recommendations, and cost-benefit considerations to inform your decision. Both tools are evaluated based on verified data, community feedback, and technical capabilities.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose ActiveCampaign if:
- Variable usage patterns—ActiveCampaign offers pay-as-you-go pricing, ideal for fluctuating workloads
- Broader SDK support—ActiveCampaign offers 5 SDKs (4 more than Miro) for popular programming languages
- Advanced analytics—ActiveCampaign provides deeper insights and data visualization capabilities
- Specialized in marketing automation—ActiveCampaign offers category-specific features and optimizations for marketing automation workflows
- Unique features—ActiveCampaign offers email marketing and automation capabilities not found in Miro
Choose Miro if:
- Cross-platform access—Miro works across 3 platforms, while ActiveCampaign is more limited
- Built for developers—Miro is designed specifically for technical teams with advanced features and API-first architecture
- Community favorite—Miro has 133 upvotes (923% more than ActiveCampaign), indicating strong user preference
- Unique features—Miro offers collaboration and real-time editing capabilities not found in ActiveCampaign
Pro tip: Start with a free trial or free tier if available. Test both tools with real workflows to evaluate performance, ease of use, and integration depth. Consider your team size, technical expertise, and long-term scalability needs when making your final decision.
When to Choose Each Tool
When to Choose ActiveCampaign
ActiveCampaign is the better choice when you prioritize developer-friendly features (5 SDKs vs 1). ActiveCampaign provides 5 SDKs (4 more than Miro), making it ideal for teams with specific requirements.
Ideal for:
- Variable usage patterns—ActiveCampaign offers pay-as-you-go pricing, ideal for fluctuating workloads
- Broader SDK support—ActiveCampaign offers 5 SDKs (4 more than Miro) for popular programming languages
- Advanced analytics—ActiveCampaign provides deeper insights and data visualization capabilities
- Specialized in marketing automation—ActiveCampaign offers category-specific features and optimizations for marketing automation workflows
- Unique features—ActiveCampaign offers email marketing and automation capabilities not found in Miro
Target Audiences:
When to Choose Miro
Miro excels when you need broader platform support (3 vs 2 platforms). Miro supports 3 platforms compared to ActiveCampaign's 2, making it ideal for development teams needing technical depth.
Ideal for:
- Cross-platform access—Miro works across 3 platforms, while ActiveCampaign is more limited
- Built for developers—Miro is designed specifically for technical teams with advanced features and API-first architecture
- Community favorite—Miro has 133 upvotes (923% more than ActiveCampaign), indicating strong user preference
- Unique features—Miro offers collaboration and real-time editing capabilities not found in ActiveCampaign
Target Audiences:
Cost-Benefit Analysis
ActiveCampaign
Value Proposition
Freemium model allows gradual scaling without upfront commitment. Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage. API and SDK access enable custom automation, reducing manual work.
ROI Considerations
- API access enables automation, reducing manual work
Miro
Value Proposition
Freemium model allows gradual scaling without upfront commitment. Multi-platform support reduces need for multiple tool subscriptions. API and SDK access enable custom automation, reducing manual work.
ROI Considerations
- Single tool replaces multiple platform-specific solutions
- API access enables automation, reducing manual work
Cost Analysis Tip: Beyond sticker price, consider total cost of ownership including setup time, training, integration complexity, and potential vendor lock-in. Tools with free tiers allow risk-free evaluation, while usage-based pricing aligns costs with value. Factor in productivity gains, reduced manual work, and improved outcomes when calculating ROI.
Who Should Use Each Tool?
ActiveCampaign is Best For
- Marketing Professionals
- Business Executives
- Entrepreneurs
- Remote Workers
Miro is Best For
- Software Developers
- Product Managers
- Business Executives
- Educators
- Students
Pricing Comparison
ActiveCampaign
Pricing Model
Freemium, Enterprise, Contact for Pricing
Details
ActiveCampaign offers a 14-day free trial, followed by tiered subscription plans: Starter (from $15/month), Plus (from $49/month), Pro (from $79/month), and Enterprise (from $145/month). The exact price depends on the number of contacts. Enterprise plans require contacting sales for custom pricing. There is no freemium plan; only a free trial is available.
Estimated Monthly Cost
$+/month
Miro
Pricing Model
Freemium, Enterprise, Contact for Pricing
Details
Free plan offers basic features with 3 boards. Starter at $8/user/month (annually), $10/month (monthly); Business at $16/user/month (annually), $20/month (monthly); Enterprise plan requires contacting Miro for custom pricing, typically for 30+ users. All tiers can be billed monthly at a higher rate.
Estimated Monthly Cost
$+/month
Strengths & Weaknesses
ActiveCampaign
Strengths
- Free tier available
- Developer-friendly (5+ SDKs)
- API available
Limitations
- Few integrations
- Not GDPR compliant
Miro
Strengths
- Free tier available
- Multi-platform support (3 platforms)
- API available
- Highly rated (5.0⭐)
Limitations
- Few integrations
- Not GDPR compliant
Community Verdict
ActiveCampaign
Miro
Integration & Compatibility Comparison
ActiveCampaign
Platform Support
Integrations
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
✓ REST API available for custom integrations
Miro
Platform Support
✓ Multi-platform support enables flexible deployment
Integrations
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
✓ REST API available for custom integrations
Integration Evaluation: Assess how each tool fits into your existing stack. Consider API availability for custom integrations if native options are limited. Evaluate integration depth, authentication methods (OAuth, API keys), webhook support, and data synchronization capabilities. Test integrations in your environment before committing.
Developer Experience
ActiveCampaign
SDK Support
API
✅ REST API available
Miro
SDK Support
API
✅ REST API available
Deployment & Security
ActiveCampaign
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
Miro
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
Common Use Cases
ActiveCampaign
+3 more use cases available
Miro
+9 more use cases available
Making Your Final Decision
Choosing between ActiveCampaign and Miro ultimately depends on your specific requirements, team size, budget constraints, and long-term goals. Both tools offer unique strengths that may align differently with your workflow.
Consider ActiveCampaign if:
- •Variable usage patterns—ActiveCampaign offers pay-as-you-go pricing, ideal for fluctuating workloads
- •Broader SDK support—ActiveCampaign offers 5 SDKs (4 more than Miro) for popular programming languages
- •Advanced analytics—ActiveCampaign provides deeper insights and data visualization capabilities
Consider Miro if:
- •Cross-platform access—Miro works across 3 platforms, while ActiveCampaign is more limited
- •Built for developers—Miro is designed specifically for technical teams with advanced features and API-first architecture
- •Community favorite—Miro has 133 upvotes (923% more than ActiveCampaign), indicating strong user preference
Next Steps
- Start with free trials: Both tools likely offer free tiers or trial periods. Use these to test real workflows and evaluate performance firsthand.
- Involve your team: Get feedback from actual users who will interact with the tool daily. Their input on usability and workflow integration is invaluable.
- Test integrations: Verify that each tool integrates smoothly with your existing stack. Check API documentation, webhook support, and authentication methods.
- Calculate total cost: Look beyond monthly pricing. Factor in setup time, training, potential overages, and long-term scalability costs.
- Review support and roadmap: Evaluate vendor responsiveness, documentation quality, and product roadmap alignment with your needs.
Remember: The "best" tool is the one that fits your specific context. What works for one organization may not work for another. Take your time, test thoroughly, and choose based on verified data rather than marketing claims. Both ActiveCampaign and Miro are capable solutions—your job is to determine which aligns better with your unique requirements.
Top Productivity & Collaboration tools
- 1ChatGPTFree tier
Your AI assistant for conversation, research, and productivity—now with apps and advanced voice features.
- 5n8nFree tier
AI workflow automation for technical teams
Web AppDesktop AppCLI Tool#workflow automation#ai integration#business process automation4.3(3)481Integrations: 1
Explore by audience
FAQ
Is ActiveCampaign better than Miro for Productivity & Collaboration?
There isn’t a universal winner—decide by fit. Check: (1) Workflow/UI alignment; (2) Total cost at your usage (seats, limits, add‑ons); (3) Integration coverage and API quality; (4) Data handling and compliance. Use the table above to align these with your priorities.
What are alternatives to ActiveCampaign and Miro?
Explore adjacent options in the Productivity & Collaboration category. Shortlist by feature depth, integration maturity, transparent pricing, migration ease (export/API), security posture (e.g., SOC 2/ISO 27001), and roadmap velocity. Prefer tools proven in production in stacks similar to yours and with clear SLAs/support.
What should I look for in Productivity & Collaboration tools?
Checklist: (1) Must‑have vs nice‑to‑have features; (2) Cost at your scale (limits, overages, seats); (3) Integrations and API quality; (4) Privacy & compliance (GDPR/DSA, retention, residency); (5) Reliability/performance (SLA, throughput, rate limits); (6) Admin, audit, SSO; (7) Support and roadmap. Validate with a fast pilot on your real workloads.
How should I compare pricing for ActiveCampaign vs Miro?
Normalize to your usage. Model seats, limits, overages, add‑ons, and support. Include hidden costs: implementation, training, migration, and potential lock‑in. Prefer transparent metering if predictability matters.
What due diligence is essential before choosing a Productivity & Collaboration tool?
Run a structured pilot: (1) Replicate a real workflow; (2) Measure quality and latency; (3) Verify integrations, API limits, error handling; (4) Review security, PII handling, compliance, and data residency; (5) Confirm SLA, support response, and roadmap.