Fish Audio vs SteosVoice
Neutral, data‑driven comparison to evaluate audio generation.
Comparing 2 AI tools.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Upvotes | 22 | 2 |
Avg. Rating | 4.0 | N/A |
Slogan | Dive into the sounds of the ocean | Vocal cords of Artificial Intelligence for everyone. |
Category | ||
Pricing Model | Freemium Pay-per-Use Enterprise Contact for Pricing | Freemium Enterprise |
Monthly Pricing (USD) | $0 – $150 / month Min$0 / month Mid$20 / month Max$150 / month Free tier | $0 – $50 / month Min$0 / month Mid$6 / month Max$50 / month Free tier |
Pricing Details | Free tier with 8000 credits and up to 7 minutes of S1 per month ($0/month), Plus plan effectively $20/month on monthly billing or $5.5/month when billed annually (up to 200 minutes S1 and 400 minutes v1.5/v1.6 per month), Pro plan effectively $150/month on monthly billing or $37.5/month when billed annually (up to 27 hours S1 and 54 hours v1.5/v1.6 per month). Flexible pay-as-you-go API usage is priced separately with no subscription minimums. Enterprise options and custom rate limits are available on request. | Free tier via Telegram bot (up to ~150,000 characters/month); paid web plans from $6/month (~1222 minutes) and $15/month (~3833 minutes); Pro/Enterprise up to $50/month (unlimited usage, commercial rights) |
Platforms | ||
Target Audience | Content Creators, Software Developers, Marketing Professionals, AI Enthusiasts | Content Creators, Software Developers, Marketing Professionals, Customer Service |
Website |
Why this comparison matters
This comprehensive comparison of Fish Audio and SteosVoice provides objective, data-driven insights to help you choose the best audio generation solution for your needs. We evaluate both tools across multiple dimensions including feature depth, pricing transparency, integration capabilities, security posture, and real-world usability.
Whether you're evaluating tools for personal use, team collaboration, or enterprise deployment, this comparison highlights key differentiators, use case recommendations, and cost-benefit considerations to inform your decision. Both tools are evaluated based on verified data, community feedback, and technical capabilities.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Fish Audio if:
- Developer-friendly—Fish Audio provides comprehensive API and 12 SDKs for custom integrations, while SteosVoice has limited developer tools
- Broader ecosystem—Fish Audio offers 11 integrations vs SteosVoice's 0
- On-premise deployment—Fish Audio supports self-hosted installations for maximum data control
- Specialized in audio editing—Fish Audio offers category-specific features and optimizations for audio editing workflows
- Unique features—Fish Audio offers ai text to speech and instant voice cloning capabilities not found in SteosVoice
Choose SteosVoice if:
- Multi-platform flexibility—SteosVoice supports 4 platforms (3 more than Fish Audio), ideal for diverse teams
- Unique features—SteosVoice offers text-to-speech and voice synthesis capabilities not found in Fish Audio
- Works across 4 platforms for team flexibility (3 more than Fish Audio)
Pro tip: Start with a free trial or free tier if available. Test both tools with real workflows to evaluate performance, ease of use, and integration depth. Consider your team size, technical expertise, and long-term scalability needs when making your final decision.
When to Choose Each Tool
When to Choose Fish Audio
Fish Audio is the better choice when you prioritize extensive integrations (11+ vs 0). Fish Audio offers 11+ integrations vs SteosVoice's 0, making it ideal for teams with specific requirements.
Ideal for:
- Developer-friendly—Fish Audio provides comprehensive API and 12 SDKs for custom integrations, while SteosVoice has limited developer tools
- Broader ecosystem—Fish Audio offers 11 integrations vs SteosVoice's 0
- On-premise deployment—Fish Audio supports self-hosted installations for maximum data control
- Specialized in audio editing—Fish Audio offers category-specific features and optimizations for audio editing workflows
- Unique features—Fish Audio offers ai text to speech and instant voice cloning capabilities not found in SteosVoice
Target Audiences:
When to Choose SteosVoice
SteosVoice excels when you need broader platform support (4 vs 1 platforms). SteosVoice supports 4 platforms compared to Fish Audio's 1, making it ideal for teams with specific requirements.
Ideal for:
- Multi-platform flexibility—SteosVoice supports 4 platforms (3 more than Fish Audio), ideal for diverse teams
- Unique features—SteosVoice offers text-to-speech and voice synthesis capabilities not found in Fish Audio
- Works across 4 platforms for team flexibility (3 more than Fish Audio)
Target Audiences:
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Fish Audio
Value Proposition
Freemium model allows gradual scaling without upfront commitment. Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage. Rich integrations minimize workflow disruption and training costs. API and SDK access enable custom automation, reducing manual work.
ROI Considerations
- Reduced integration costs through native connections
- API access enables automation, reducing manual work
SteosVoice
Value Proposition
Freemium model allows gradual scaling without upfront commitment. Pay-as-you-go pricing aligns costs with actual usage. Multi-platform support reduces need for multiple tool subscriptions.
ROI Considerations
- Single tool replaces multiple platform-specific solutions
Cost Analysis Tip: Beyond sticker price, consider total cost of ownership including setup time, training, integration complexity, and potential vendor lock-in. Tools with free tiers allow risk-free evaluation, while usage-based pricing aligns costs with value. Factor in productivity gains, reduced manual work, and improved outcomes when calculating ROI.
Who Should Use Each Tool?
Fish Audio is Best For
- Content Creators
- Software Developers
- Marketing Professionals
- AI Enthusiasts
SteosVoice is Best For
- Content Creators
- Software Developers
- Marketing Professionals
- Customer Service
Pricing Comparison
Fish Audio
Pricing Model
Freemium, Pay-per-Use, Enterprise, Contact for Pricing
Details
Free tier with 8000 credits and up to 7 minutes of S1 per month ($0/month), Plus plan effectively $20/month on monthly billing or $5.5/month when billed annually (up to 200 minutes S1 and 400 minutes v1.5/v1.6 per month), Pro plan effectively $150/month on monthly billing or $37.5/month when billed annually (up to 27 hours S1 and 54 hours v1.5/v1.6 per month). Flexible pay-as-you-go API usage is priced separately with no subscription minimums. Enterprise options and custom rate limits are available on request.
Estimated Monthly Cost
$0 - $150/month
SteosVoice
Pricing Model
Freemium, Enterprise
Details
Free tier via Telegram bot (up to ~150,000 characters/month); paid web plans from $6/month (~1222 minutes) and $15/month (~3833 minutes); Pro/Enterprise up to $50/month (unlimited usage, commercial rights)
Estimated Monthly Cost
$0 - $50/month
Strengths & Weaknesses
Fish Audio
Strengths
- Free tier available
- Rich integrations (11+ tools)
- Developer-friendly (12+ SDKs)
- API available
Limitations
- Limited platform support
- Not GDPR compliant
SteosVoice
Strengths
- Free tier available
- Multi-platform support (4 platforms)
- Developer-friendly (12+ SDKs)
Limitations
- Few integrations
- Not GDPR compliant
- No public API
Community Verdict
Fish Audio
SteosVoice
Integration & Compatibility Comparison
Fish Audio
Platform Support
Integrations
+3 more integrations available
✓ Extensive integration ecosystem reduces workflow friction
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
✓ REST API available for custom integrations
SteosVoice
Platform Support
✓ Multi-platform support enables flexible deployment
Integrations
Limited integration options
Developer Tools
SDK Support:
Integration Evaluation: Assess how each tool fits into your existing stack. Tools with extensive integrations reduce context switching and training time. Evaluate integration depth, authentication methods (OAuth, API keys), webhook support, and data synchronization capabilities. Test integrations in your environment before committing.
Developer Experience
Fish Audio
SDK Support
API
✅ REST API available
SteosVoice
SDK Support
Deployment & Security
Fish Audio
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
SteosVoice
Deployment Options
Compliance
GDPR status not specified
Hosting
Global
Common Use Cases
Fish Audio
+4 more use cases available
SteosVoice
+8 more use cases available
Making Your Final Decision
Choosing between Fish Audio and SteosVoice ultimately depends on your specific requirements, team size, budget constraints, and long-term goals. Both tools offer unique strengths that may align differently with your workflow.
Consider Fish Audio if:
- •Developer-friendly—Fish Audio provides comprehensive API and 12 SDKs for custom integrations, while SteosVoice has limited developer tools
- •Broader ecosystem—Fish Audio offers 11 integrations vs SteosVoice's 0
- •On-premise deployment—Fish Audio supports self-hosted installations for maximum data control
Consider SteosVoice if:
- •Multi-platform flexibility—SteosVoice supports 4 platforms (3 more than Fish Audio), ideal for diverse teams
- •Unique features—SteosVoice offers text-to-speech and voice synthesis capabilities not found in Fish Audio
- •Works across 4 platforms for team flexibility (3 more than Fish Audio)
Next Steps
- Start with free trials: Both tools likely offer free tiers or trial periods. Use these to test real workflows and evaluate performance firsthand.
- Involve your team: Get feedback from actual users who will interact with the tool daily. Their input on usability and workflow integration is invaluable.
- Test integrations: Verify that each tool integrates smoothly with your existing stack. Check API documentation, webhook support, and authentication methods.
- Calculate total cost: Look beyond monthly pricing. Factor in setup time, training, potential overages, and long-term scalability costs.
- Review support and roadmap: Evaluate vendor responsiveness, documentation quality, and product roadmap alignment with your needs.
Remember: The "best" tool is the one that fits your specific context. What works for one organization may not work for another. Take your time, test thoroughly, and choose based on verified data rather than marketing claims. Both Fish Audio and SteosVoice are capable solutions—your job is to determine which aligns better with your unique requirements.
Top Audio Generation tools
- 4TransformersFree tier
State-of-the-art AI models for text, vision, audio, video & multimodal—open-source tools for everyone.
Web AppCLI ToolAPI#open source ai library#transformer models#pretrained model hub4.3(4)184Integrations: 1 - 5ElevenLabsFree tier
Make digital interactions fluid, natural, and effortless with lifelike AI voices.
.png?alt=media&token=a14be77f-4f73-4734-aa6e-778fde588d23){kind=small}
Explore by audience
Missing a comparison feature?
Help us improve by suggesting what you'd like to compare
FAQ
Is Fish Audio better than SteosVoice for Audio Generation?
There isn’t a universal winner—decide by fit. Check: (1) Workflow/UI alignment; (2) Total cost at your usage (seats, limits, add‑ons); (3) Integration coverage and API quality; (4) Data handling and compliance. Use the table above to align these with your priorities.
What are alternatives to Fish Audio and SteosVoice?
Explore adjacent options in the Audio Generation category. Shortlist by feature depth, integration maturity, transparent pricing, migration ease (export/API), security posture (e.g., SOC 2/ISO 27001), and roadmap velocity. Prefer tools proven in production in stacks similar to yours and with clear SLAs/support.
What should I look for in Audio Generation tools?
Checklist: (1) Must‑have vs nice‑to‑have features; (2) Cost at your scale (limits, overages, seats); (3) Integrations and API quality; (4) Privacy & compliance (GDPR/DSA, retention, residency); (5) Reliability/performance (SLA, throughput, rate limits); (6) Admin, audit, SSO; (7) Support and roadmap. Validate with a fast pilot on your real workloads.
How should I compare pricing for Fish Audio vs SteosVoice?
Normalize to your usage. Model seats, limits, overages, add‑ons, and support. Include hidden costs: implementation, training, migration, and potential lock‑in. Prefer transparent metering if predictability matters.
What due diligence is essential before choosing a Audio Generation tool?
Run a structured pilot: (1) Replicate a real workflow; (2) Measure quality and latency; (3) Verify integrations, API limits, error handling; (4) Review security, PII handling, compliance, and data residency; (5) Confirm SLA, support response, and roadmap.